Families' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.